Pounds lost is just one data point, and it's often the least interesting one
A 2025 meta-analysis of 16 studies involving 6,098 participants found no statistically significant difference between intramuscular, oral, and sublingual B12 supplementation routes
The drug has not yet been approved or made available
And this is important both in terms of thinking about what effects you're going to get of taking a given peptide, if you decide to do that, as well as potential side effects, as well as things like how to adjust dosage and how long to take a peptide, whether or not to cycle the peptide, et cetera
Importantly, we need to be vigilant in checking B12 signs because its normal range, especially when it is within the lower level of normal range, may indicate deficiency progression
Here is exactly why, with the published clinical evidence on half-life, dual-pathway activation, GH pulse profile, and which patient profile each peptide actually fits